User talk:MZaplotnik
|
dlib
[edit]Teh treh knjig mi UploadWizard ne pusti naložit iz dlib.si ([1], [2], [3]). Če ti uspe... --Sporti (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- DLib trenutno ne deluje, bom poskusil naložiti, ko bo spet dostopen. ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 08:09, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Sporti: , prvi dve mi je uspelo naložiti, tretja mi je pa spodletela. Bom poskusil ponovno jutri. Sem nekje zalsedil, da so bile težave pri nalaganju fajlov nad 100MB in da so te težave medtem že odpravili. Prosim za pomoč pri kategoriziranju naloženih dveh knjig. Lp, ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 22:03, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hvala in dopolnjeno, tretja pa je tudi meni spet spodletela (neuspešno preverjanje). --Sporti (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Meni vseskozi javlja 'internal error' - nemogoče je preveriti, ali je nalaganje uspelo in ponudi samo možnost, da znova naložim spodletelo datoteko. Bom spet probal čez nekaj dni.--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Sporti: Sem še nekajkrat poskusil, a brez uspeha. Naložil sem pa 8 datotek s starimi slovenskimi slovnicami, hvaležen ti bom, če preveriš, ali vse štima, predvsem predloge in dovoljenja. A se mogoče da predlogo
{{Book
dodati že med nalaganjem z UploadWizardom? lp, ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 18:32, 10 November 2014 (UTC)- Ne, Book se ne žalost ne da dodati z UW, zato raje nalagam knjige brez UW (če niso prek 100 MB). --Sporti (talk) 06:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Sporti: Sem še nekajkrat poskusil, a brez uspeha. Naložil sem pa 8 datotek s starimi slovenskimi slovnicami, hvaležen ti bom, če preveriš, ali vse štima, predvsem predloge in dovoljenja. A se mogoče da predlogo
- Meni vseskozi javlja 'internal error' - nemogoče je preveriti, ali je nalaganje uspelo in ponudi samo možnost, da znova naložim spodletelo datoteko. Bom spet probal čez nekaj dni.--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 17:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Hvala in dopolnjeno, tretja pa je tudi meni spet spodletela (neuspešno preverjanje). --Sporti (talk) 09:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Pa še tole, če ti uspe [4] (nekaj mi ffmpeg2theora štrajka), tako da sem naložil le nekaj screenshotov. --Sporti (talk) 15:05, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
- Že nalagam webm tega videoposnetka. ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 19:39, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Spet nekaj: [5], [6]. --Sporti (talk) 16:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- @Sporti: Že nalagam. --ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 16:05, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Ti uspe kaj narediti npr. z [7]? Majhna različica je že naložena, lahko čeznjo. Na žalost so blokiral uporabnika, ki jih je od tam prej nalagal, tudi sicer nisem našel kakšnih navodil ali koga, ki bi nalagal z Google Art Projecta. Če ti slučajno uspe, jih je še nekaj iz ormoškega muzeja... --Sporti (talk) 16:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Sem uspel najti nekoga, ki ima neko skripto za tole. --Sporti (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Sporti: , super, da si zrihtal, jaz se v Google Art Projectu še ne zdajdem dobro, pa še zadnje čase sem malo manj tukaj.--M★Zaplotnik (edits) 14:58, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Ti uspe naložiti [8]? Meni se ustavi na 1 sekundi. --Sporti (talk) 11:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Sporti: , na več načinov sem se mučil, da bi naložil katero od knjig (velikih PDFjev) z zapisniki, pa brez uspeha, čeprav sem sprobal v treh različnih posodobljenih brskalnikih. Opažam, da je čarovnik za nalaganje že toliko hroščast, da je praktično neuporaben, tudi za manjše datoteke. Osnovna stran za nalaganje mi ne pusti naložiti niti PDFja z dobrimi 400 MB, javlja mi napako "413 Request Entity Too Large", pa imam omogočene chunk uploads v nastavitvah. Zadnje upanje je bil skript https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rillke/bigChunkedUpload.js , ki naj bi bil v pomoč prav pri nalaganju večjih datotek po delčkih; ko se mi datoteka naloži, pa mi aplikacija sporoči napako "FAILED: success" in to je to. Kaj ti si tudi že poskusil s tem Rillkejevim skriptom? kakšen je rezultat pri tebi? LP M★Zaplotnik (edits) 19:50, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- Poskušal sem le z Wizardom (naj bi delalo do 1 GB), bom še z Rillkejevim. Včasih je bil dober Commons:Up!, ampak na žalost se je zgubila koda. Commons:VicuñaUploader pa sploh ne odpre datoteke, da bi lahko poskusil naložiti. MMG si pogledal v Special:UploadStash (Troubleshooting: In case the last chunk was uploaded and you see an error, please go to your UploadStash and try publishing from there.). --Sporti (talk) 08:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Nisem vedel, da ta funkcija obstaja. Odpre mi seznam 33 PDF datotek z generičnimi imeni, verjetno je med njimi tudi katera z zapisniki, vsaj dvakrat se mi je naložila v celoti. Katerokoli želim odpreti, mi javi "Internal Server Error Cannot serve a file larger than 1048576 bytes". Samo 1 MB?! M★Zaplotnik (edits) 09:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ja isto se mi je zgodilo (FAILED: success). Poskušal sem z url2commons (vrže ERROR : 504 Gateway Time-out), ampak očitno je to precej globalen bug. --Sporti (talk) 10:29, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
- Zdaj so dodali opcijo use stash and async na bigChunkedUpload ravno za te težave in mi je uspelo enega naložiti. --Sporti (talk) 16:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
Našel sem novo orodje za nalaganje videov z youtuba ali drugje [9], pa še enega za urejanje videov na splošno [10]. --Sporti (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sporti, jaz za prenos posnetkov z YT uporabljam vtičnik YouTube Center v brskalniku Maxthon (obstaja tudi za Safari, Chrome, Opero, Firefox). Je namreč edina aplikacija, kar jih poznam, ki omogoča direktno shranjevanje videov z YT v format WebM. Za posnetke od drugod, ki obstajajo v drugih formatih, pa še vedno uporabljam Miro Video Converter, katerega uporabo so včasih priporočali na Zbirkini strani za pomoč pri pretvarjanju. Če se mi bo kdaj zataknilo, bom uporabil novega, ki ga omenjaš. Hvala in LP, M★Zaplotnik (edits) 15:55, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Tole naj bi ti preneslo, konvertiralo in naložilo direktno, ima pa še kakšnega buga... --Sporti (talk) 16:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- Zdaj so popravili in dela BP, teče pa vse na strežniku, ni ti treba ničesar down/uploadat. --Sporti (talk) 10:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sem poskusil s par videi in tudi meni deluje brezhibno. Eno uporabnejših orodij zadnje čase. Morda se za implementacijo tega orodja skriva želja vodilnih pri Wikimediji, da bi se na Zbirki povečal delež videoposnetkov, ki so procentualno po krivici slabo zastopani. Je bil že čas. M★Zaplotnik (edits) 17:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ne verjamem, da je tole ravno visoko na želji vodilnih, drugače bi jih bilo malo več angažiranih na projektu, zdaj je bolj ali manj eden. Je pa priročno, da vse teče na njihovem strežniku, ker je lahko precej dolgotrajno in zahtevno za procesor in internetno povezavo. Sčasoma bodo verjetno še kaj dodelali, zdaj npr. ne moreš ustaviti postopka ali pa ponoviti, če ne uspe, včasih vrže tudi še kakšno drugo napako. Deluje pa dobro tudi, če je velikost čez 1GB, ko ti ustvari zahtevo za Server-side upload. --Sporti (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nekateri že naloženi videi niso v najvišji kvaliteti, video2commons pa ne omogoča nalaganja čez obstoječe, tako da sem nekatere naložil znova. --Sporti (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sporti, ja, sem opazil. Pri popolnih dvojnikih predlagam, da posnetke nižje kakovosti predlagaš za hitro brisanje. Npr. File:Po drugi seji vlade (HD).webm / File:Po drugi seji vlade.webm.
- Samo nekateri "moji" posnetki imajo bogatejšo kategorizacijo (prim. File:Borut Ambrožič na kongresu "pozitivcev".webm in File:Ambrožič na kongresu pozitivcev.webm) in ponekod, kjer sem avtor jaz sam, morda tudi opis (gl. tale ogv z angleščim dodatkom proti webmju z enega mojih YT kanalov. Predlagam, da to pred izbrisom prekopirava na novo naložene posnekte. M★Zaplotnik (edits) 19:48, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ja kategorije in opis se lahko skopira, čakam samo na review najprej, preden se kaj briše. Je pa iskalnik po youtubu malo čuden, ne najde ravno vsega vedno... --Sporti (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
- Nekateri že naloženi videi niso v najvišji kvaliteti, video2commons pa ne omogoča nalaganja čez obstoječe, tako da sem nekatere naložil znova. --Sporti (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Ne verjamem, da je tole ravno visoko na želji vodilnih, drugače bi jih bilo malo več angažiranih na projektu, zdaj je bolj ali manj eden. Je pa priročno, da vse teče na njihovem strežniku, ker je lahko precej dolgotrajno in zahtevno za procesor in internetno povezavo. Sčasoma bodo verjetno še kaj dodelali, zdaj npr. ne moreš ustaviti postopka ali pa ponoviti, če ne uspe, včasih vrže tudi še kakšno drugo napako. Deluje pa dobro tudi, če je velikost čez 1GB, ko ti ustvari zahtevo za Server-side upload. --Sporti (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
OTRS permissions queues
[edit]Hello MZaplotnik. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
File:Shod proti plenjenju in klientelnemu kadrovanju 05-sept-2013 618.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 07:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Ljubljana 181.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Slovenian Sign 22.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
File:Slovenian Sign 27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:44, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Piran 07.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 09:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Shod soočenja 17.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:43, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Slovenian Sign 31.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 11:23, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Slovenian Sign 21.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 11:35, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Category:Shod_proti_korupciji_in_za_javni_interes,_Koalicija_proti_korupciji_(13_December_2013)
[edit]
Shod proti korupciji in za javni interes, Koalicija proti korupciji (13 December 2013) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Sturm (talk) 03:55, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Shod proti korupciji in za javni interes Koalicija proti korupciji 13-dec-2013 38.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 18:10, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Happy fear - lučke povsod, svobode nikjer.webm has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
INeverCry 22:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elizabeth L. Remba Gardner, Women's Airforce Service Pilots, NARA-542191.jpg
[edit]Hi, Thanks for closing this, but you should wait for the bot. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Yann, I thought I can speed things up. Ok, I'll wait in the future. Thanx, M★Zaplotnik (edits) 21:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
File:Graffiti Ljubljana 167.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
FPC??
[edit]Why did you move two closed FPs that were featured to the log? If you do that, the users will get no FP notification and the photos will not be added to the right galleries by the bot. Only 'not featured' should be moved manually to the log. I'll restore that edit now. --cart-Talk 17:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- W.carter, sorry, my mistake (I haven't close FPCs for a while). Thnx for the correction. MZaplotnik(talk) 18:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Kinomotel
[edit]Kaj misliš, so res vse te reklame pod prosto licenco [11]? Nekaj sem jih pred časom naložil za probo (Category:Videos by Kinomotel) --Sporti (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Očitno res niso...[12] --Sporti (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Sporti, ja, tega sem se bal. Sem iskal, ali je nalagatelj v kakšni povezavi ali s produkcijsko hišo, ki je posnela reklame, ali z naročniki reklam, pa je tudi jaz nisem našel. LP, MZaplotnik(talk) 10:16, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Potrditev
[edit]Lahko potrdiš File:Zoo di Ljubljana.webm in File:Petrol - Žan Kranjec - podpis sponzorske pogodbe.webm? Glede na veliko število nepotrjenih videov lahko takrat ne bosta več pod isto licenco ali bosta odstranjena. --Sporti (talk) 14:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Done, opozori me, če je še kakšen slovenski že dolgo v čakalni vrsti, zaradi velike količine posnetkov mnogih ne opazim. MZaplotnik(talk) 15:37, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
V bistvu jih je kar precej: [13], morda pa nekaterih ni več na Youtube, vsaj eden uporabnik jih je hitro pobrisal. --Sporti (talk) 12:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- (Še enkrat, ker si po moje spregledal). --Sporti (talk) 10:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2019! ;-)
[edit]Admin Request Vote
[edit]Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Elisfkc anymore, I wanted to reach out and thank you for your support on my admin request. Even though it didn't end the way I wanted, I appreciate your support. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Special Barnstar | |
For all your good work with keeping FPC clean from 'withdrawn' and reviewing/closing nominations. It is this kind of work that keeps the project running smoothly. Cart (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2019 (UTC) |
Duplicate procedure
[edit]Hi MZaplotnik, I'm contacting you becouse you closed the procedure Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched) 2.jpg, which was missed by the bot. That probably happend becouse Yann moved the file and the procedure on 2019-03-13. This is the original page: Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lansdowne Herakles Getty Museum (retouched).jpg. There are now two pages referring to the same event. Could them be merged? Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, I don't know what happened. It seems I recreated the page after I moved it... Fixed. :oS Yann (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann! I was confused too. MZaplotnik(talk) 18:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Media of the Day
[edit]Hi there,
I don't know if it was you personally that made my video of the Tay Rail Bridge crossing the media of the day a while back, but it's nice to know it was appreciated and thanks either way!
All the best,
Yottanesia (talk) 21:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Potrditev 2
[edit]Spet sem naložil nekaj video posnetkov in bi bilo fino, če jih potrdiš, ker jih čaka skoraj 12000 in vprašanje kdaj bodo drugače na vrsti ([14]).--Sporti (talk) 09:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- Hvala za pregled, jih je bilo kar precej... --Sporti (talk) 10:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Spet sem jih nekaj naložil in tudi našel nekaj že naloženih in jih pokategoriziral - cca 50. --Sporti (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
File:Violeta Tomič.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fenikssonce (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi MZaplotnik,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Potrditev 3
[edit]Spet sem jih nekaj naložil in tudi našel nekaj že naloženih in jih pokategoriziral - cca 70 [15]). --Sporti (talk) 07:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Sporti, do januarja nameravam ročno pregledati videe, ki jim po novem ustreznost licence potrdi že bot. Fajlu File:4k Lake Bled Walking Tour ,Slovenia in Ultra.webm bi bilo dobro preventivno odstraniti glasbeno podlago, licenca je ok (zahvaljujoč wayback mašini). MZaplotnik(talk) 15:52, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Super, da so to uredili, ker jih kar precej umakne video po nekaj časa. Sicer pa trenutno ne deluje nalaganje z Youtuba. --Sporti (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020!
[edit]Archiving
[edit]Not sure why the Bot skipped processing this set (also 'ping' Eatcha about this) or why you archived it. When you do so, you must also do all the other tasks the Bot normally do. Archiving it to log is not enough. I have fixed the rest now: [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]. When you archive a promoted image from FPC, please first make sure the bot has done its job. --Cart (talk) 11:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wcarter I re-added that candidate to the list, the primary reason for failure was missing namespace prefix "File:". And other minor reasons like 1. I forgot to change the preloader for sets. The bot would mostly likely close the candidate appropriately in the next run. Eatcha (talk) 14:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks for fixing this so promptly Eatcha. Let's hope everything works now! :) --Cart (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Hallo MZaplotnik, ich habe gesehen, dass du hier erst gestern vorbei aktiv warst, deshalb wiederhole ich hier meine Frage, die die Kärnter Slowenin Mimi Malenšek betrifft, die es in der de-WP nicht gibt - Soll so sein ;-). In der slowenischen Wikipedia gibt es einen ausführlichen Artikel über sie, den ich leider mangels Sprachkenntnis nicht verstehe. Zusätzlcih gibt es noch einen Artikel in der slowenischen Wikisource unter https://sl.wikisource.org/wiki/Mimi_Malen%C5%A1ek - da versteh ich zwei Dinge nicht, da wir in der deutschsprachigen Wikisource nur Transkriptionen haben also nur Abschriften von freigegebenen Werken. Aber die zweite Frage ist zum Foto. Ist denn dieses Foto nicht unter einer freien Lizenz, dass es sich nicht auf Commons befindet? Vielleicht kannst du mir da weiterhelfen. Vielen Dank nach Slowenien. lg -- K@rl (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- übersehen? --K@rl (talk) 07:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2020/2021!
[edit]San Marino
[edit]Hi,San Marino is an independent state, thank you.--Commonists 18:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hello there Commonists! I know San Marino is its own state but I found a few San Marino photos in Italian FP galleries, like File:Fortress of Guaita 2013-09-19.jpg in Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy and I simply followed this logic. Thanks for creating a new gallery. MZaplotnik(talk) 20:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Slovenia
[edit]Rather, I have to come to Slovenia in September. Can you tell me if you need a green pass for restaurants, museums etc? Thanks.--Commonists 18:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Slovenia will quickly turn to orange state but hopefully we will not have another lock-down till winter. Masks are obligatory in public interiors and EU-covid certificate is requied almost everywhere -- even in some open air events. You can have a scanned copy on your phone and just show QR code, that is mostly enough. Another option is test, which is only valid 48/72 hrs and will not be free anymore. Our government decisions change quickly so you look for update info before you travel. MZaplotnik(talk) 20:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- ok thank you--Commonists 20:46, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy decline
[edit]Hi, why did you speedy decline the candidate Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:View_of_Ribeira_from_Jardim_do_Morro_(2).jpg? There is one supporting vote, so the 9 days period has to be fully applied. --Kreuzschnabel 22:36, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
- Kreuzschnabel, I reinstated the nomination. Looks like FPCBot treated one supportnig vote as the one from a nominator. Apologies. MZaplotnik(talk) 07:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2021/2022!
[edit]Potrditev 4
[edit]Živjo. Video2commons je spet začel delovati za Youtube, le bot pregledovalec nekatere datoteke izpusti. Obstajajo pa galerije po uporabnikih npr. User:EatchaBot/Files-requiring-license-review-gallery-uploaded-by/Sporti, kjer je tudi nekaj slik iz par let nazaj. --Sporti (talk) 07:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sporti, super, da si naložil nov material, se bom ob priliki lotil potrjevanja. LP MZaplotnik(talk) 10:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Lahko brišeš prvo verzijo, ker je pomota - File:Boštjan Gorenc Pižama 2020.png? --Sporti (talk) 09:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- Živjo! Tukaj nisem admin, samo pregledovalec licenc, reci Eleassarju ali KK-ju. --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Živjo. Bot od aprila ne deluje več, tako da se spet nabirajo videi ([21]). --Sporti (talk) 06:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays 2022/2023!
[edit]
File:Slika-Sončni zahod + lunin vzhod pogled z Muzca(Musca) (1612m) na Triglav (2864m), Krn (2244m) in Stol (1673m).jpg
[edit]File:Slika-Sončni zahod + lunin vzhod pogled z Muzca(Musca) (1612m) na Triglav (2864m), Krn (2244m) in Stol (1673m).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
TadejM (t/p) 01:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
[edit]Merry Christmas and a happy, healthy and successful New Year 2024! |
Season Greetings
[edit]Wishing You all the best for the Holiday Season! I hope You are warm, safe and treated kindly |
Happy holidays and best wishes!
[edit]Happy holidays!
Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC) |
Happy holidays!
[edit]* Happy Holidays! * | ||
|
Happy holidays!
[edit]* Happy Holidays! * | ||
|
Predlogi za predloge za izbrano sliko
[edit]Nekaj fotografij sem naredil, od katerih bi mogoče kakšno predlagal za izbrano, vendar kolebam, če so dovolj posebne in kakovostne:
- File:Lookout Rock of Kunšperk 03.jpg
- File:Lookout Rock of Kunšperk 19.jpg
- File:Bizeljsko Castle 27.jpg
Misliš, da se splača katero dati na glasovanje? Janezdrilc (talk) 18:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Janezdrilc Sliki s Kunšperka imata preveč digitalnega šuma. Slika Bizeljskega gradu pa mi je osebno všeč, čeprav bi ji lahko očital, da objekt preveč zakrivajo drevesa. Bizeljsko Castle 26.jpg pokaže več, jaz bi predlagal njo. LP MZaplotnik(talk) 10:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Hvala za konstruktivno kritiko. Pri Bizeljsko Castle 26 me moti neposrečeno vreme, saj je nebo čisto belo oziroma se zdi, kot da ga sploh ni. Moram enkrat trofit priliko na sončni dan pa pred brstenjem dreves, ko grad postane še bolj zakrit. To pot raje ne bom predlagal katere za izbrano. Mogoče te ob priliki še kdaj poprosim za mnenje te vrste. Hvala še enkrat. --Janezdrilc (talk) 14:25, 17 February 2024 (UTC)