User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little hint. With all due respect

[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6zaCV4niKk&ab_channel=Yusuf%2FCatStevens

There are people who always manage to turn a good day into a bad day for others. And there are also people like you who make it almost impossible to take further part in this project.

Think about it. Just keep your own problems to yourself and start having a little more respect for others. The world is beautiful, and it's beautiful because there are people who are constructive. I realize this won't even affect you emotionally, but I just wanted to let you know. Hubertl 17:48, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

good music. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 19:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but rude message. // sikander { talk } 🦖 22:13, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see sincerity in the message. This account is still tolerated in this project only because it acts like a worm that decomposes garbage, and nothing more. It's a pity that it doesn't focus on the real garbage – copyright violations – but on images related to freedom of panorama. Being autistic like them, I understand their hyperfocus, but I would like them to realize it and start acting constructively instead of being so harassing as they are now. Please note that nominating images to deletion due to violating freedom of panorama is not and has never been the issue with this account. RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Hubertl, Modern primat, and RodRabelo7: Actually this account is bordering the problem user. We should also face the matter of users with whom interaction is difficult to impossible. -- Blackcat 09:18, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Blackcat - I noticed the Commons link you provided below. @Hubertl to your point, there is "history" here in a similar link for English Wikipedia, where they were indefinately blocked for "abusing multiple accounts." -- Ooligan (talk) 20:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS Moreover. It's a problem user who abused the patience of administrators. If it were for me I wouldn't have unblocked because they's disrupting the project. 12.26, 14 Ağustos 2024‎ Blackcat (A)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stop Putler sign.jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stop Putler sign.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

A.Savin 12:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Free at Last (5348588795).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 08:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti, Market St (158728378).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:EU2024BE 240530 FAC Trade Council European Union Council JNZT 0069 (53756470272).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 02:51, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mural deletion

[edit]

I look forward to you tagging everything at Category:Murals in the United Kingdom for deletion, rather than just a couple of files. - SchroCat (talk) 04:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two selective deletion requests (DR's) in a small category, while no DR for your favored image used in Wikidata.

[edit]

Here on Wikidata you replaced an image and then did a Deletion Request (DR) for the image file you removed from wikidata here. The reason was "No FoP," but the image you recently placed in wikidata is also subject to this same exact DR reason ("No FoP"). However, you did not nominate for deletion the image you personally favored. You also nominated for deletion (DR), another similar image of the same building, and subject to the exact same "No FoP."

Would you please explain, why? I'm also, pinging @SchroCat Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 00:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 1.jpg appears to be de minimis, but File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg isn't. I have no preferences on which image to be used. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote, "I have no preference on which image to be used," but you did have a preference by your nomination File:Luxemburg Grand Theatre 2.jpg for deletion. So, why write that you "have no preference?" -- Ooligan (talk) 15:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I said no preference on which image to be used on Wikidata, not no preference on the deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The words you wrote before this most recent reply- did not include the word "Wikidata," so you meant to write Wikidata, but didn't. I can't guess what you mean unless you write it.
Your latest reply is deliberately misleading. Are you actually reading the links I provided above? -- Ooligan (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of speedy delete SD G7 (author or uploader request deletion)- instead of more specific and accurate "duplicate."

[edit]

As you know how to use the "duplicate" tag very well. This is the second time, that I'm aware that you used speedy delete reason G7, instead of the more accurate and specific "duplicate" tag. That earlier time you also used "SD|G7," instead of "duplicate" was just after your recent unblock.

Also, you used a deceptive edit summary by writing "doing 1 replacements" on these 5 duplicate files:

File:V20240429LJ-1091 (53893697533).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1173 (53893871105).jpg, File:V20240506LJ 0480 (53893871090).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1069 (53893460146).jpg, File:V20240429LJ-1178 (53893460086).jpg.

I added the recommended specific duplicate tag to these files. In the future, please use duplicate tags per COM:SPEEDY. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems this bulk edit of theirs stuffed a number of things up - see my question below Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit

[edit]

Hi. I am curious - why did you mark File:Historical coal mine Hoym-Ignatius (8855330335).jpg as uncategorized? Gbawden (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should be a miss when performing a batch task. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:熱帶風暴戈登襲美國墨西哥灣沿岸地區.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

IrishSurfer21 (talk) 21:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul

[edit]

Hi, please help me to check the upload from this user. It is suspected to be using fake license and claims. Exagren (talk) 02:32, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 17:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
That's for defending against CP. Lemonaka (talk) 18:39, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Secretary Blinken Visits NEC Future Creation Hub (53888808696).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pleiades (51381212690).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milkyway and Perseid (51379448137).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

// sikander { talk } 🦖 14:25, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK to merge Co-op tea DRs?

[edit]

Would you mind if I merged these DRs that all relate to the same mural?

This will avoid copying essentially the same discussion across four pages. --bjh21 (talk) 14:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --bjh21 (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]